GSA Partner Pieces – Global Sight Alliance https://globalsightalliance.net Uniting Efforts to Overcome Cataract Blindness Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:27:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.14 https://globalsightalliance.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/cropped-voi-globe-grid-32x32.png GSA Partner Pieces – Global Sight Alliance https://globalsightalliance.net 32 32 Corneal Transplantation in the Developing World https://globalsightalliance.net/corneal-transplantation-in-the-developing-world/ Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:12:29 +0000 https://globalsightalliance.net/?p=4347

The case against most corneal transplants in low-income countries.

The problem with corneal transplants in the developing world is that sometimes they are not needed,  might result in more eye problems, and often no follow-up care.

It is fairly easy to obtain corneal tissue and bring in a capable ophthalmic surgeon to do the corneal surgery. That’s the easy part. Post-op everyone is congratulating themselves on a clear transplant. But the problem is there often is no post-op care. The patient is often not able to travel for any post-op care, no matter what you think you have set up.  

Usually, the only drops the post-op patient will ever have is what you give them on discharge. They probably will not be able to obtain anymore, much less once daily for life as many corneal surgeons recommend post-penetrating keratoplasty. The patient may well not be able to purchase the drops, and the nearest pharmacy could be hours away on foot. If there is any problem ( broken suture, rejection, iritis, ocular hypertension, dehiscence,  ulcer, etc,  ), it is quite unlikely the patient will quickly see an ophthalmologist, and, if so only after a month or so when the prognosis is now quite poor. And so with any problem, it is possible the graft could fail. Even if the initial post-op concern ( ? broken suture ) was minor.

I would suggest if the patient pre-op has 20 / 70 or better in the other ( good ) eye, then don’t do a corneal transplant. If you take an eye ( cornea ) that has an old scar, do a transplant, then a graft rejection, and later bullous keratopathy  ( pain, tearing, redness  ), then you have not made the patient better, but worst. I have seen this and have written about this previously.

Years ago, when I was the only ophthalmologist full-time in southern  Malawi  ( 4 million population ) ) a young girl showed up ( with her mother ) with bullous keratopathy from having had a keratoplasty done at an airport in Kenya. I hospitalized her as she had pain, redness, tearing, photophobia, etc. Her well-meaning ophthalmic surgeons had not made her better but worst. Certainly less likely now to snag a husband. The vision in the other ( good ) eye without any correction was 20/20. The mother stated she had previously had an old quiet corneal scar. Terrible. Using  North American criteria for penetrating keratoplasty consideration is often not appropriate for the developing world. Many visiting ophthalmic surgeons ( volunteers ) never understand that fully. It took me initially about 6 months of living and working in Tanzania to realize a lot of my western medicine training  ( beliefs ) were simply not appropriate for the developing world.

What would really be of interest if you went back 6-12 months after the initial keratoplasties, and, on the patients, you can run down, and record their presenting visions, not their best correction acuity but how they showed up. Record the presenting vision with both eyes open and then each eye separately. Many post-op keratoplasty patients, often have 2 – 3 diopters of cylinder even with a clear graft, so without any correction, what’s the post-op presenting vision?

Don’t get me wrong there are many patients needing a penetrating keratoplasty, but not if the other eye already sees well. Let me give you an example. If you have a patient with bilateral poor vision  ( corneal scars ), then a keratoplasty may be indicated. Or perhaps an only eye if the pre-op vision is quite poor. Maybe. Try not to make the patient worst, you know first, do no harm. An Argon laser can often be used to re-make the anterior chamber ( pupilloplasty, etc. ) and improve the vision.

 

Of course, many developing world patients have poor vision due to bullous keratopathy post-cataract surgery, so endothelial keratoplasty may well be indicated. Difficult to have ophthalmologists show up for endothelial keratoplasty with proper instruments. Unfortunately one of the leading causes of poor vision in the developing world is poor vision post-cataract surgery.

Wealthy patients who already have family in the States or elsewhere in the industrialized world might do better traveling to the States / western Europe where their family members already live. Better post-op options/care.

Anyway, these are my thoughts about penetrating keratoplasty surgery in low-income countries. Some of you may disagree with my opinions.

]]>
Suggestions for Doing Outreaches with Local Eye Workers https://globalsightalliance.net/suggestions-for-doing-outreaches-with-local-eye-workers/ Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:51:53 +0000 https://globalsightalliance.net/?p=4335

Below are teachable suggestions if you are doing outreach with local eye workers

  1. Always take reading glasses as many eye patients in rural outreach clinics will simply need/want readers. ”I can’t see close up” was the chief complaint.

  2. Topical NSAIDs — ketorolac ( Acular ), diclofenac ( Voltaren ), bromfenac (Xibrom ), flurbiprofen ( Ocufen ), nepafenac ( Nevanac ), etc. are usually helpful for “ allergic conjunctivitis” which is quite common in the developing world —itchy eyes, red eyes, tearing, mild discomfort, etc. Safer than topical steroids. Take NSAID drops with you if possible  cold compresses, don’t rub, NSAID drops tid prn.

  3. No matter how you are checking IOP, a difference of more than 3 mm is questionable and the IOP should be rechecked in both eyes. One of the readings might be incorrect. Yes, but which one?  The different readings could be correct but need to recheck OU and encourage the patient not to squeeze. An IOP of over 25 probably merits having the patient come to the eye clinic for further evaluation, especially if the patient is black, elderly, diabetic, and/or has a family history of glaucoma/blindness.

  4. Bring several  ( bright ) flashlights on outreach. Probably good to bring two direct ophthalmoscopes, especially if they need to be recharged rather than just changing the batteries.

  5. Use a Snellen chart having numbers or the tumbling  E’s. Many patients are illiterate and can’t read letters but almost everyone can read numbers. If you can’t read numbers then you can’t count money.

  6. The green light (red-free light ) on the ophthalmoscope is good for looking at retinal blood vessels and appreciating small hemorrhages / IRMA’s / early neovascularization. Diabetic retinopathy should not be in just one eye. If you see retinal hemorrhages, exudates, etc. in just one eye, the problem could be a retinal vascular event  ( BRVO, etc. ) rather than secondary to their diabetes. If you see changes in one eye, then go back and look again closely in the other eye (  use green light ? ).

  7. You can use a  direct ophthalmoscope to look closely at the conjunctiva and/or the anterior chamber. It can be quite helpful. Get close to the patient’s eye and use a + 8 to +10 D setting and get the limbal vessels in focus. For the examiner, this might require a +8 or a +9 or a +10 setting. The key is to get close to the eye , use a lot of plus power ( + 9 D ? ), and get the limbus in focus.

    Remember you are not trying to visualize the retina ( posterior pole ) but the anterior segment. You might have to go up or down the plus scale ( black numbers )  a little and get slightly closer or further from the patient’s eye but you can see a lot. If you wanted to view the anterior segment what would you want? Well, some illumination and some magnification. That’s what you have with the direct ophthalmoscope. You can usually appreciate posterior synechiae, pupillary ruff differences, and sometimes rubeosis but what it is great at showing is posterior subcapsular opacity  ( psc ) with a dilated pupil and a red reflex. Then you can really appreciate the cataract opacity/shadow in the red reflex.

    In the field, sometimes a cataract doesn’t look so impressive but then looking with a dilated pupil and the direct ophthalmoscope will show the psc. The big question to ask the patient is if the vision is worst in bright light. Often yes with psc. I have used a portable slit lamp on many occasions, once doing an onchocerciasis survey in a rural rugged area of Malawi where we had to carry everything on our backs ( no roads) and walk in about a mile. This technique of using the direct ophthalmoscope compares well with a portable slit lamp for looking at the anterior segment.

Again these are pointers you can easily teach eye healthcare workers when doing outreach.

]]>